Comparison of 53 Major Smart Contract Blockchain Platforms
By
and 
Disruptr.ch has developed an assessment and maturity framework to help you selecting the best blockchain platform for your need.
We assess the popularity, quality, ease of use, access, costs, scalability, attractiveness, industry focus of all these blockchain platforms Contact Us now
Disruptr collect additionally following 88 indicators: [ICO end, ICO start, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Number Dapps, access, accounts, advisors, atomic swap, attractiveness, block producer, blocksize, blocktime (s), circulating supply, client, company code, consensus, contract language, contracts, costs, created_at, decentralization, description, dex, documentation, ease of use, explorer, fork, forks_count, formal verification, founding, fullNode, gdpr, github_releases, github_stars, governance, head block, history, industry focus, investors, language, launch, license, logo, market cap rank, market_cap, max supply, maxtps (realtime), motto, name, new tokens, nodes, open_issues_count, our analysis, our rating, performance tx/s, platform code, popularity, price, privacy, quality, reddit users, rewards, roadmap, scalability, sdk, sidechain, social, stackoverflow questions, staked, state channels, team, technology, testnet, ticker, token, total supply, transactions, turing, tx cost, type, unstaked, unstaking, updated_at, url, wallet code, wallets, watchers, whitepaper]
Attractiveness: Fees are a key element to attract users, projects, and developers. We normalized
fees in $. We Use f(x)=intvalue(0.5−0.5/(0.5+x))*10 as function to produce number between 0 and 5, moreover:
- Expensive fees, highest volatility
-
- Fees are low, or can be payed in another non native token, TomoChain (TRC-21)
or Binance Chain (natively)
Costs: What does it cost to run a node, pay for licenses, deploy smart contract, pay developers,
training costs, ...
- Expensive
- High
- Medium
-
Low
- Free
Ease of use: we are looking at the ecosystem around each blockchain platform:
- Difficult to find developers e.g. Haskel language, lack of manuals, alpha
software quality
- Beta software quality, not all tools available, few
software development kits (SDK)
- Stable, tools are
available
-
Stable, tools are available, trainings and books are widely available, lots of Stackoverflow.com help
- All of the above, really easy to find developer, manual updated
Popularity: We Use f(x)=intvalue(0.5−0.5/(0.5+x))*10 as function to produce number between 0 and 5,
Popularity rating is
mean(f(number of individual address), f(number of dApps), f(number of github stars), f(number of forks) )
- Low popularity
- Medium popularity
-
- high popularity
Quality: We Use f(x)=intvalue(0.5−0.5/(0.5+x))*10 as function to produce number between 0 and 5,
quality rating is
mean(-f(number of open bug), f(number of pull requests), f(number of releases), f(official blog post), -f(day to fix
0day))
- Low quality
- Medium quality
-
- high quality
Scalability: We took into account the growing development of 2nd layer solutions that should
provide greater scalability for legacy blockchains (e.g., Ethereum, Bitcoin with lighning) while reducing on-chain
fees and allowing users to transact at near-zero fees.
- not in work
- have plan
- In development
-
Available, testing
- Ensured, natively scalable, proven